<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Toad Stool by Alan Wolk - Latest Comments</title><link>http://toadstool.disqus.com/</link><description>Insights and analysis on the television industry, with a particular focus on the second screen</description><atom:link href="https://toadstool.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 15:10:46 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twitter Is A Broadcast Network. Not A Social Network. Deal With It.</title><link>http://www.toadstoolblog.com/2015/06/twitter-is-broadcast-network-not-social.html#comment-2097634543</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I tend to agree Twitter has huge unmet potential as a bradcaster of sorts. I'm wishy-washy about agreeing people are fearful of public tweeting thinking its a matter of context; tweet from a bar or restaurant and you'll hear it all.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">virtualCableTV</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 15:10:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who Needs Networks Anyway? Bringing Film and Television Directly To The Consumer</title><link>http://www.toadstoolblog.com/2015/02/who-needs-networks-anyway-bringing-film.html#comment-1913250557</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Dave and thanks for the comment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;While I agree with you for the most part, I think there is room for well known producers and screenwriters and actors to band together and produce their own series that they then market without a middleman. You'd need to find people with enough name recognition that the media buzz around the show would more be intense and who were savvy enough to get the right OTT distribution deals.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That's a lot of "ifs" but it could be done.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alan Wolk</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 01:00:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who Needs Networks Anyway? Bringing Film and Television Directly To The Consumer</title><link>http://www.toadstoolblog.com/2015/02/who-needs-networks-anyway-bringing-film.html#comment-1913084703</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's a bit like authors rushing to self-publish to eliminate the middlemen. Unfortunately, the middlemen do add value, if nothing more than being gatekeepers. I self-publish, but I don't trust myself enough to think I can publish without having an editor cast a jaundiced eye on what I write. Similarly, anyone can post videos, but it takes collaboration to produce something that will rise above the noise.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Casler</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 22:08:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Great Video Uprising</title><link>http://www.toadstoolblog.com/2014/11/the-great-video-uprising.html#comment-1743306502</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Alan: I started on this project when I retired about two years ago, and although both were slow to start, the growth in video is impressive, by just about any measure. The text blog is a huge disappointment. &lt;br&gt;It's my impression that there are a significant group who use youtube as a search engine instead of google. And I know that I rate much higher on youtube than on google for the products I've covered. Viewers come from youtube searches and recommendations (the tiles you see at the end of a video)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Maarten Heilbron</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:37:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Great Video Uprising</title><link>http://www.toadstoolblog.com/2014/11/the-great-video-uprising.html#comment-1743070047</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Those are interesting stats Maarten. Was there a point where the numbers started to skew more heavily towards video, or have they always been at that ratio?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alan Wolk</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 08:41:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Great Video Uprising</title><link>http://www.toadstoolblog.com/2014/11/the-great-video-uprising.html#comment-1713529273</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As someone who maintains both a blog and a youtube channel with roughly similar content about technology - I'd call my efforts on youtube a success with over 2500 views per day, while the blog barely gets 2000 views a month. That overview extends to likes, shares, comments - the entire engagement. To me anyway, it's clear that the public is far more interested and far more likely to engage with video than text.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Maarten Heilbron</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 08:06:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dawning Of The Rise of the Next Golden Age</title><link>http://www.toadstoolblog.com/2014/10/the-dawning-of-rise-of-next-golden-age.html#comment-1639571061</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can't say I entirely agree with: "Because it’s no longer just about a seaon's worth of 22 or 44 minute scripts, cranked out week after week. It’s about creating an entire world around a show via second screen and social and gaming and other media and understanding that the ultimate viewer of those experiences may not actually see them during the lifetime of their creators."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why isn't it? Breaking Bad doesn't require "a world" of other stuff to be entertaining. Is it fun to create these value-added experiences for the hardcore fan base? Sure. But I don't agree that all content will exist this way, and further I think a lot of production studios are going to through gobs of $ at utterly pointless "frills" because they think they "have to".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'd wager that for the top 10% of shows  - BB, GoT, HoC, etc - and I trust you to know those names :) - all the fluff isn't needed.  Do "the kids today" really give a crap?  No evidence there... *yet*&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeremy Toeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 16:18:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Big Changes Afoot</title><link>http://www.toadstoolblog.com/2014/09/big-changes-afoot.html#comment-1574808963</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You are welcome Eoin. Thanks for the good wishes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alan Wolk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2014 23:17:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Big Changes Afoot</title><link>http://www.toadstoolblog.com/2014/09/big-changes-afoot.html#comment-1574808698</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you Chuck. You've left some big shoes to fill. Glad to have you around as Chairman Emeritus to help with the transition.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alan Wolk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2014 23:16:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Big Changes Afoot</title><link>http://www.toadstoolblog.com/2014/09/big-changes-afoot.html#comment-1571107266</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Best of luck Alan - cant wait for the book.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">EoinBox</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 18:40:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Big Changes Afoot</title><link>http://www.toadstoolblog.com/2014/09/big-changes-afoot.html#comment-1571101936</link><description>&lt;p&gt;very happy to have you on board as Chairman Alan.  I am expecting you to work with Guy and Marty to drive things to the next level for the industry as a whole.  And big congrats on finishing the book!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chuck Parker</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 18:35:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In Defense Of Authenticity</title><link>http://www.toadstoolblog.com/2014/08/in-defense-of-authenticity.html#comment-1569165208</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Few weeks late, but yup. Spot on.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Schoneveld</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2014 13:58:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Internet Isn’t Beating Television, It’s Becoming It</title><link>http://www.toadstoolblog.com/2014/08/the-internet-isnt-beating-television.html#comment-1550373045</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In the end, from a consumer's POV everything is a multipurpose screen. Consumers can either easily get whatever they want on it, or they can't -- and their strong preference will always be to pay as little as possible for what's on it. The major challenge for the TV Industrial Complex is how to get people to pay attention (we're endlessly distracted) and dollars (free options are everywhere). HBO and Netflix have proven it can be done, at least for now. But consumer attention is limited, and for most households, incomes aren't rising. Will cable be able to command the big monthly dollars that it currently does when we look ahead 10 years? Time will tell, but it's hard to imagine how they will pull that magic trick off.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom_Cunniff_NYC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 19:07:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Fans Versus Tumbler Fans</title><link>http://www.toadstoolblog.com/2014/08/twitter-fans-versus-tumbler-fans.html#comment-1530081313</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you Thomas. That is very kind.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alan Wolk</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 10:01:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Fans Versus Tumbler Fans</title><link>http://www.toadstoolblog.com/2014/08/twitter-fans-versus-tumbler-fans.html#comment-1530002089</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This should be required reading for everyone in Hollywood - very succinct and well thought out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thomas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 08:58:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Spotifyization of Television: Towards A Newer, Better Business Model</title><link>http://www.toadstoolblog.com/2014/04/the-spotifyization-of-television.html#comment-1377998696</link><description>&lt;p&gt;alan, did you check out WatzOn.TV? 24 hours a day it's only entertainment you want to see! thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brad waddell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2014 08:10:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Spotifyization of Television: Towards A Newer, Better Business Model</title><link>http://www.toadstoolblog.com/2014/04/the-spotifyization-of-television.html#comment-1317092508</link><description>&lt;p&gt;much appreciated alan!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brad waddell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 13:44:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Spotifyization of Television: Towards A Newer, Better Business Model</title><link>http://www.toadstoolblog.com/2014/04/the-spotifyization-of-television.html#comment-1317075309</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the heads up Brad. Will definitely check out WatzOn!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alan Wolk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 13:34:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Spotifyization of Television: Towards A Newer, Better Business Model</title><link>http://www.toadstoolblog.com/2014/04/the-spotifyization-of-television.html#comment-1317074244</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you Carlo&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alan Wolk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 13:34:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Spotifyization of Television: Towards A Newer, Better Business Model</title><link>http://www.toadstoolblog.com/2014/04/the-spotifyization-of-television.html#comment-1315529099</link><description>&lt;p&gt;alan, already done and ready to watch! at least number 5 - WatzOn.TV creates personalized "lean-back" linear tv mix based on each users preferences using a wealth of freely available video sources and running on any device the user prefers - would welcome your feedback! thanks&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brad waddell</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 15:45:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Spotifyization of Television: Towards A Newer, Better Business Model</title><link>http://www.toadstoolblog.com/2014/04/the-spotifyization-of-television.html#comment-1314917946</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'll have to digest and think about it properly but that seem quite a good parallelism&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carlodemarchis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 10:44:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are DVRs Doomed?</title><link>http://www.toadstoolblog.com/2014/02/are-dvrs-doomed.html#comment-1243390532</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Cynthia. They may be able to sell the VOD commercials for more money, as they are better able to target them. But I agree, it will be a tricky balancing act as their desire for more profit conflicts with consumer's desire for less interruptions.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alan Wolk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 19:08:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are DVRs Doomed?</title><link>http://www.toadstoolblog.com/2014/02/are-dvrs-doomed.html#comment-1243308757</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't the broadcast networks want to have the same commercial load on VOD as on air? If they do that, I agree with you, it will fail. But DVRs may also be on way out. In our household, we stopped using the DVR because we are all using subscription streaming services instead. The USX is better, and we find plenty to watch.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Morningsider</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:47:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: There Ought To Be A Law: Using Congress To Change The Television Industry</title><link>http://www.toadstoolblog.com/2013/12/there-ought-to-be-law-using-congress-to.html#comment-1147549606</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed Tom. It will be an erosion and slower than the erosion that happened to the music and radio industries where a clearly identifiable alternative showed up and seemed to shift the landscape overnight. &lt;br&gt;And it is most definitely complicated.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alan Wolk</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 12:34:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: There Ought To Be A Law: Using Congress To Change The Television Industry</title><link>http://www.toadstoolblog.com/2013/12/there-ought-to-be-law-using-congress-to.html#comment-1147545871</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Alan, for a long time I held the same POV. But I now believe that the real alternative to TV is "everything else" -- Netflix, Amazon, Apple, HBO, Smart TVs, Facebook, email, games, etc etc. 3 of the 6 Emmy-nominated dramas in 2013 were on networks that did not allow advertising. These factors all erode the ability of TV to deliver affordable mass reach. In the history of media, few ever "die" -- but most wane in importance. Our industry tends toward polar thinking: a medium is dead or alive, the future or the past. Reality has more shades of gray. Bottom line, I see a declining future for TV. At the same time, it pays to remember that a TV industry that's 30% of its current size would still be, by any measure, a substantial business. Long story short: TV's future is complicated :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom_Cunniff_NYC</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 12:31:24 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>